Prepare
Use documented median/mode imputation.
↗ACADEMIC PROJECT / PYTHON + PANDAS / GITHUB / 05
An exploratory view of Melbourne property data, 2016–2018.
EXPLORE THE STORY ↓A descriptive relationship, not a causal effect.
THE BUSINESS PROBLEM
Explore relationships while keeping missing values, outliers and genuine luxury properties in context.
Strongest reported price correlation among the examined variables. Association, not causation or a predictive accuracy score.
WHAT I DID
Use documented median/mode imputation.
↗Apply percentile-based capping and review the trade-offs.
↗Visualise Pearson relationships with Python and communicate the limits.
↗THE RESULTS
Rooms had the strongest reported price correlation among the variables examined. The work makes data-cleaning choices part of the story.
Data period explored.
Reported rooms–price correlation.
Reproducible exploratory workflow.
Treat correlation as a starting point for further modelling, not a guaranteed price effect.
↗THE EVIDENCE / GO DEEPER
LET’S DISCUSS YOUR PROJECT ↗Which property characteristics are associated with price, and how do cleaning choices influence the interpretation?
The repository describes median/mode imputation, percentile-based outlier capping, Pearson correlations, and Matplotlib/Seaborn visualisation. It also recognises that high-value observations can represent genuine luxury properties rather than errors.
The README reports that rooms had the strongest price correlation among the variables examined, at approximately 0.47, with a slight decline in average price across the period. Correlation is descriptive and does not establish a causal price effect.
A documented exploratory workflow, attention to data-quality trade-offs, and the ability to communicate patterns before moving to predictive modelling.
Source: public GitHub project README and linked academic reports.
YOUR NEXT MOVE